共享单车超50万辆 成都设立“3+7+N”协商制度管理

Background

百度 这座玻璃桥位于张家界大峡谷景区，是世界最高、跨度最长的玻璃桥，大桥建在大峡谷两侧的峰顶上，横跨大峡谷，桥拱距谷底相对高度约400米，全长约370米，桥面全部采用透明玻璃铺设，桥中心有全球最高的蹦极。

Currently commons separates SVG images from other images, see for example Category:SVG flags and Category:Flags. It was proposed elsewhere to change this.

Arguments for moving SVG files into respective main topic categories:

• make files easier to find
• avoid maintaining 2 or more parallel cat structures
• whether a file is SVG or not is sufficiently well visible on the extension

Catches:

• categories for language-neutral SVG:s and multilanguage SVG:s should remain, since it is NOT visibile on the extension or anywhere whether a SVG file maybe is language-neutral or multilanguage or not
• there are other non-subject features possibly worth categorization (videos without sound, animated GIF:s PNG:s WEBP:s, ...)

Questions:

• Should the categories for SVG such as Category:SVG flags only get hidden, or completely deleted?

Taylor 49 (talk) 00:27, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Darn. While you drafted this RfC, I drafted a CfD: Commons:Categories for discussion/2025/02/Category:SVG by subject. --Enyavar (talk) 01:29, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

@Taylor 49 and Enyavar: Copying my comment from the CFD, I don't have much issues with deleting SVG categories beyond "Level 2". But the main problem I see is the potential overcrowding of categories like Category:SVG maps of India, for which I suggest to add the {{CategoryTOC}} template. I've also crafted a template at User:Sbb1413/sandbox for automatic categorization of SVG files into appropriate categories. Sbb1413 (he) (talk ? contribs ? uploads) 11:15, 13 February 2025 (UTC)